Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Episcopal Muslim Priest

WorldNetDaily reported yesterday about an Episcopal priest in Seattle.

A veteran Episcopal priest says she became a Muslim just over a year ago and now worships at a mosque Fridays – but that hasn't stopped her from donning her white collar Sunday mornings.

"I am both Muslim and Christian, just like I'm both an American of African descent and a woman. I'm 100 percent both," Rev. Ann Holmes Redding told the Seattle Times.


Kurt Fredrickson, director of the doctor of ministry program at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., told the Times there are "tenets of the faiths that are very, very different."

"The most basic would be: What do you do with Jesus?"

Fredrickson explained that while Christians consider Jesus Christ to be God, Muslims regard him as only a prophet.

Redding, 55, doesn't think it's necessary to resolve all of the contradictions, arguing even people within Christianity can't agree on all the details.

"So why would I spend time to try to reconcile all of Christian belief with all of Islam?" she asked. "At the most basic level, I understand the two religions to be compatible. That's all I need."

Somewhere along the way, this woman turned off her brain, and it appears to have atrophied.

"It wasn't about intellect," Redding said. "All I know is the calling of my heart to Islam was very much something about my identity and who I am supposed to be.

"I could not not be a Muslim."


My concern with her is not that she converted to Islam. People do that, and as a Christian, I respect her free will to believe whatever she chooses.

But Islam says it's not compatible with Christianity. And Christianity says it's not compatible with Islam. So her dual faith is a theological impossibility.

Then why on earth is she still a priest in the Episcopal church?

Redding's embrace of Islam has been affirmed by her bishop, Rt. Rev. Vincent Warner, who thinks the interfaith possibilities are exciting.

He's an idiot too.

Perhaps if some lone Muslim fanatic attacks her church instead of a Jewish group, all in the interest of saving the priest's Muslim self from the infidel Christian influence, then the bishop might decide that's a little too much excitement. But I'm not holding my breath.

And how on earth will Redding counsel her flock? Will Episcopalians who come to her with questions be given Islamic answers? How will she be able to keep the lid on her religious blender so her special puree doesn't splatter all over the congregation? It's a recipe for disaster.

Too much of the Episcopal church in America has thrown Christian doctrine out with the trash in favor of feel-good social policy. Without the foundational tenets of the Christian faith, starting with the divinity of Jesus, you're left with nothing more than a social club whose leaders wear frocks and funny little white collars.

I'm skeptical that Rev. Ann Holmes Redding ever accepted the real Jesus as her Savior, or that she ever embraced Christianity. She sounds like someone who does what feels good and goes where she feels she belongs--someone tossed around by the waves of her own emotions.

And how does the imam down at the mosque see her dual faith?

She has been accepted by the mosque she regularly attends, the Al-Islam Center of Seattle. But Hisham Farajallah, president of the Islamic Center of Washington, is among the Muslim leaders who don't understand how she can remain an Episcopalian.

It seems strange to say it, but I'm with the imam on this one.

11 comments:

Malott said...

Ah, the religious Left.

Once you've included the gay priest... Is the Muslim priest such a stretch? Can the witch priest be far behind?

Worshiping Satan in any of his subtle forms was this denomination's destination the moment it officially questioned the Divine Word of God.

They might further define themselves by bringing back Baal worship. That would somehow satisfy my appreciation for symmetry.

Anonymous said...

Many years ago, Christian apologist Walter Martin said, "When I was a boy, the Episcopal church stood for something. Now, it will fall for anything." In all of his wisdom, I do not think Dr. Martin could have imagined this.
Dave L.

janice said...

This woman sounds like she suffers from "attention" deficit disorder. Not the normal kind found in children by teachers who don't know how to teach, rather from lack of attention at home by her husband, mother, father,
coworkers, the grocer, dentist or next door neighbor.

Or, maybe she's hedging her bets?

What an imbecile.

Yup, for once I can say I agree with the imam on this.

Jacob said...

Incompatible? I would say that many of the fundamentals of Christianity are incompatible with one another (love thy neighbour contrasting with stoning people to death, for example) so why should this particular model of religion be any less logical than the one you follow?

We have gay priests now, and even women priests (gasp!), and I think it more or less just demostrates how religion, like everything else, is never static.

Malott said...

Jacob,

God is static.

Julianne Wiley said...

Dear Jacob,

I need to make sure you get this message so you don't miss something important:

Stoning people to death is not a doctrine or practice of Christianity.

In fact, quite the contrary.

Sincerely and amiably,

Julianne Wiley

Mojo_Risin said...

Stoning is a matter of Jewish law, and since Jesus said not one jot or tittle shall pass from the law, I don't see how it isn't part of Christianity, as well...

And Puppy, you said something in your post about how people "choose" their beliefs. I don't really think that's how it works. Or, at least, that's not how it should work.

Our beliefs should be beyond the power of wants and desires, and should instead arise from deep roots within our selves. Otherwise, they are not really based on faith, but reason, which isn't what Jesus was all about ("faith of a child," and all).

Anonymous said...

It appears that folks just like to use one example to condemn and justify their own lives. Since Jesus did this on the cross, I am not sure why you or anyone else feels a need to attack someone for doing something that is no more gross than American Christians acceptance of American supremacy; consumerism; or unlimited economic accumulation.

Rather than worrying about a priest who prays in two ways, I would suggest minding one's own walk of faith with all of the blindness that allows us to think ourselves superior to this one woman. Be glad that God is a God of mercy, forgiveness, and love who gives us all time to regain vision of the Kingdom of God. Amen, brothers and sisters?

Logs in my own eyes

SkyePuppy said...

Anonymous,

My biggest concern is not with the Muslim Episcopalian woman, whose decisions are between her and God (although I can't understand how she can be both, but again that's her choice).

My issue is with a Christian church hierarchy that not only condones having a Muslim as a priest but also welcomes it. She should have been removed as a priest when she converted to Islam. Church leadership is held to a higher standard of accountability, because of the ability of someone in a leadership role to lead others astray.

And as for the logs in my own eyes, I address them in a different forum.

I'm glad you stopped by.

Anonymous said...

Please know that not all priests support this kind of crap and are frankly stated, embarrassed by all the shenanigans. This is obviously idolatry. Gay? Muslim? Transgender?

What are you thinking; do you think the priesthood is a joke? I do not.

Jacob said...

do you think the priesthood is a joke?

Yes.